Site is almost complete. Please bear with us. Subscriptions are unavailable.

Another deal from Victor

Another deal from Victor

One of my best sources for deal, Victor Markowicz, played this deal online. As South, he held:

A9862
♥ K85
♦ AKQJ9
♣ --

He opened 1 and his partner bid 2NT, Jacoby. Rather than describe, Victor decided to ask. He jumped to 5. That is the infamous "Exclusion Keycard Blackwood." It asked partner how many keycards he held, excluding the club suit. North's answer was disappointing: Zero! So, Victor put on the brakes in 5 and received a low club lead:

QJ105
♥ J107
♦ 62
♣ AQ96
A9862
♥ K85
♦ AKQJ9
♣ --

Wanting to be in dummy, he took the A (finessing might result in East playing the K on the Q and no easy dummy entry). He led the Q and got good news and bad news. The finesse won, but West discarded a club.

Now what? The J held and then a spade to the 9 won the 4th trick (West continuing to throw clubs).

Should the last trump be drawn? This was the real deal:

QJ105
♥ J107
♦ 62
♣ AQ96
--
♥ Q43
♦ 108754
♣ J8742
K743
♥ A962
♦ 3
♣ K1053
A9862
♥ K85
♦ AKQJ9
♣ --

If you draw the last trump, you are down. Diamonds misbehave and you have to lose a diamond trick. Eventually, you have to lose two more tricks.

At the key point (after the third round of spades), Victor saw that as long as diamonds behaved, he was fine. So, instead of drawing the last trump he started the diamonds from the top. East ruffed in and laid down the A, so the contract made easily.

East could have given declarer more of a problem (eventually needing a guess), but at least by keeping that trump in dummy, declarer was always able to survive the bad diamond break.