Author: Larry Cohen
Date of publish: 11/1/2015
Level: Intermediate to Advanced
Results for Set 9
For instructions, click here.
Board 1, West deals, nobody vulnerable, North bids clubs
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Scores for Board 1:
3NT(by West):10
4: 7
2NT (by West): 6
3NT (by East) 5
3: 4
2NT (by East): 3
I like to open light, but West's doubleton-queen is of dubious value. Presuming West passes, North opens 1 and East has to decide if he should enter. My motto is, "when in doubt, get in early." Especially since East-West aren't vulnerable, I'd stick my two cents in with a takeout double. Will West do more than jump to 2
? If he bids 2
, surely he will buy it there. This is a difficult combination to evaluate--in effect, all cards are pulling their full weight. "But Larry, tell us how to get to the right contract?" Sorry--I get asked this often--and sometimes it is just too tough.
Board 2, West deals, both vulnerable
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Scores for Board 2:
5:10
4: 7
4/3N/6
: 5
other partials: 4
After West's 1, East is not strong enough to respond 2
if playing 2/1 GF. Some pairs have available a 3
response as invitational (over which West would have a tough decision). If East responds with a forcing notrump, West will rebid 2
(wanting to bid 2 1/2 hearts). East is now quite heavy to bid 3
, but without any fancy system tools, I can't see anything else (maybe pass 2
?) West would likely pass, East's 3
, leading to a reasonable score of 7 out of 10. Other than 5
, no game is very attractive.
Board 3, Nobody vulnerable, South opens 3 and North bids 4
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Scores for Board 3:
6:10
5: 6
4X:5
7: 4
West has no choice but to double 3 and over North's raise, East would like to bid more than 4
. If he bids only 4
West might move again (5
comes to mind) and East will surely bid slam. If East bids 5
the first time (whatever it means--maybe asking for a club control), West will go to slam (maybe via 6
). Seven has play since there are chances in diamonds, spades, or for a squeeze.
Board 4, East-West vulnerable, South deals and opens 1
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Scores for Board 4:
7: 10
7NT: 8
6NT: 8
6: 7
5NT: 4
5: 3
It is never easy to reach a grand slam when the opponents open (it seem like a psyche, if you ask me). After 1--P--P-- East should start with a double. After a balancing double, West can't insist on game (the balancing could be light), so 2NT (invitational) feels right. Now, East can bid 3
(I am not mentioning ELCD--but some experts will know what I am referring to) if he is sure it shows a good hand with diamonds (forcing). West should not woodenly insist on 3NT (his hearts aren't great and he has a good hand for diamonds). I think from this point it would be good enough for East-West to reach any slam. If anyone reaches 7
, all I can say is "brilliant" (or lucky). Notice that 7NT has great chances since there are 12 top tricks and maybe a 13th on a squeeze (or at worst, a spade finesse).
***Full Book by Larry Cohen with Bidding Practice and results/analysis.***