Home>>Bridge Articles>>100 Articles>>2011 GNT Part 2

2011 GNT Part 2

Author: Larry Cohen Date of publish: 10/1/2011 Level: Intermediate to Advanced

PrevPrev Printer friendly version 

Last month, you had a chance to try your hand at four deals from the first half of the 2011 Grand National Team finals.

 

Here are four more:

 

5)  You are West, on lead against 5♣X after this auction:

♠K Q 9 5
♥K Q 9 8
♦J 8 2
♣10 8
 

 

 

 


WestNorthEastSouth
YOU



   1♦2♣
Dbl
4♣
 4♥5♣
 DblPass
Pass
Pass

 

Now that you've doubled twice, what do you lead?

 

6) You hold: ♠A 9 6
♥A J 8
♦A Q 9 7 4
♣7 2
. You are vulnerable against not and it goes 2♠--Pass-4♠ to you. Your call?

 

7) At favorable vulnerability, you hold: ♠10 9
♥4 2
♦A J 10 9 6 3
♣K 10 2
. At your favorable vulnerability, Jeff Meckstroth opens with a strong, forcing, Precision 1♣ on your left. Partner passes and RHO bids an artificial 2NT, showing a game-forcing hand with 4-4 in the majors and a singleton in a minor. Your call.

 

8) Vulnerable against not, you hold: ♠K 7 4 3
♥--
♦9 8 3
♣A Q J 7 5 3
. RHO deals and opens 3♥. You boldly double (I agree--the hand with shortness needs to be aggressive against preempts). LHO raises to 4♥ and partner makes a card-showing double. And you?

 

ANSWERS:

5) I hope you selected a trump. Where else can the opponents possible get tricks other than by ruffing? At the table, a heart was led (by a former world champion) and declarer easily ruffed three diamonds in dummy to make 11 tricks. It turns out that the contract can still make on a trump lead (declarer sets up spades), but I still consider it a huge blunder not to lead a trump.
Vul: None
Dir: East
♠J 7 6 4 3
♥10 7 5 3
♦--
♣Q 9 7 4
 
♠K Q 9 5
♥K Q 9 8
♦J 8 2
♣10 8
 ♠10 8
♥A J 4 2
♦K Q 9 5 4 3
♣J
 ♠A 2
♥6
♦A 10 7 6
♣A K 6 5 3 2
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6) Our hero (so far, five of the six errors in this two-part article were made by a long-time expert pair) passed. Double would show cards/values. I think he was worth it. Passing resulted in collecting a bunch of 50's. Doubling would get 500 or 600 in 5♦ (or 650 in 5♥) if partner pulled. Partner held: ♠Q 5
♥K Q 4 3 2
♦K 10 5 3
♣9 3

 

7) Were you a man or a mouse? I don't like being mousy when I am white versus red. Against maybe the world's best pair, why give them space to unleash their 800 pages of notes and surely reach the right contract? I would interfere by bidding 3♦ (maybe even 4♦!) and try to derail them. At the table, the player with these cards jumped to pass (as I like to sarcastically put it), and of course his opponents found the right contract.

 

8) I was always taught to leave in such doubles with flat/ordinary hands. With shape, I pull. This hand has SHAPE! (As my friend Marty Bergen likes to say, "the magic of voids"). I would pull (to 5♣). The result would be 5♣ doubled down one. Passing led to -590 (no way to beat 4♥X). In my opinion, one of the top-5 players of the world passed with this hand--so don't feel too badly if you did the same.

 



     

Printer friendly version PrevPrev 

Change font size to:A A A
Created by  AttainDreams ® Copyright 1998 - 2013 © by Larry Cohen