Home>>Bridge Articles>>100 Articles>>David's call from Oregon

David's call from Oregon

Author: Larry Cohen Date of publish: 2/3/2009 Level: Intermediate

PrevPrev Printer friendly version 

Problem from the Pacific

My regular partner, David Berkowitz was playing in a regional in Oregon on the Pacific Ocean. I didn't make the trip, so David called me on the phone with this problem:

♠A 9 3
♥4
♦A Q 10 9 8 7 3
♣9 8

He gave me these cards and told me that RHO opens 2♣, Precision (11‐15 HCP and long clubs, usually 6+ cards). He imposed 3♦ (both vulnerable) as an intermediate jump overcall. Okay with me. LHO made a negative double and RHO tried 3NT. Your lead.

I told him this isn't a problem at all. With a sure side entry (♠A), I want to set up my diamonds. The best chance is to lay down the ♦A. Then, you get to see the diamonds in dummy and figure out the continuation. If dummy has ♦Jxx and declarer ♦Kx, you continue with a low diamond. If dummy has singleton or doubleton ♦J, then you continue with the queen. Some days, a smart‐alec declarer might even try 3NT with a singleton ♦K, anticipating you won't lay down the ♦A. Anyway, the ♦A seemed a standout lead. David disagreed.

He told me that neither player in his match led the ♦A (at the other table, the overcall was 2♦, LHO bid 2♥ and RHO bid 2NT raised to 3NT). Anyway, I asked around, and everyone thought the ♦A was automatic.

Here is the full deal and amusing story of what happened on the Real Deal:

Vul: Both
Dlr: South
♠J 7 6 5
♥A J 10 7 5
♦6 4
♣A 4
 
♠A 9 3
♥4
♦A Q 10 9 8 7 3
♣9 8
 ♠K Q 10 2
♥K 9 8 6 3
♦J 2
♣5 2
 ♠8 4
♥Q 2
♦K 5
♣K Q J 10 7 6 3
 

If you do lead the ♦A, you had better be smart enough to switch to spades at trick two (instead of knocking out the ♦K). In real life, the West player who overcalled 3♦, led the ♠A. His partner, playing standard signals, could have risked the 10, but played the 2 (in tempo). West figured his only chance was to continue spades and this was a rousing success. East cashed the spades and switched to the ♦J, down 7! Notice the ethics involved. If East thought forever at trick one and then played the ♠2, it wouldn't be honest/ethical for West to figure out to continue the suit. Maybe East should have played the ♠10, but it is a shame to have to signal with a defensive trick.

At the other table, West didn't lead diamonds and didn't lead spades. He chose his singleton heart! Declarer, looking at 8 sure tricks, needed the heart finesse for 9. The ♥4 looked innocent enough (it could easily have been from the king), so he finessed at trick one. Disaster! Now, the ♦J came through and the defense took 7 diamonds, 4 spades and the ♥K for down 8. That meant +800 (the hard way) and a 3‐Imp swing.

To think that I might have led the ♦A and continued diamonds for ‐600—good thing I was sitting at home instead of playing on the Pacific Coast.



     

Printer friendly version PrevPrev 

Change font size to:A A A
Created by  AttainDreams ® Copyright 1998 - 2013 © by Larry Cohen